The term "quotient verdict" is a specific legal term that may not be commonly encountered outside of legal discussions. Let’s break it down to make it easier to understand.
A quotient verdict is a type of decision made by a jury in a trial that is considered improper or unacceptable. It occurs when jurors agree to reach a verdict by averaging their individual opinions or damages, rather than based on the evidence presented in the case. This method is not allowed in most legal systems because it does not reflect a fair consideration of the facts.
In legal discussions, you might encounter phrases like "overturning a quotient verdict" or "challenging a quotient verdict in court," which refer to the legal actions taken when such a verdict is found.
There aren’t many direct variants of "quotient verdict," but related terms include: - Verdict: A formal decision made by a jury. - Compromise verdict: A type of verdict where jurors agree on a solution that may not fully satisfy all parties involved.
There are no direct synonyms for "quotient verdict," but you can refer to: - Compromise verdict: Although this term is not the same, it relates to a situation where jurors reach a decision that is not fully based on the evidence.
There are no specific idioms or phrasal verbs directly associated with "quotient verdict," but you might encounter phrases like: - "Reach a verdict": To come to a conclusion in a legal case. - "Throw out a verdict": To reject or invalidate a decision made by a jury.
In summary, a "quotient verdict" is an improper legal decision made by a jury, which is not allowed in most courts. It’s an important term in legal contexts but may not be widely used outside of those discussions.